Analysis of the restaurant review
Good afternoon. It’s been two weeks since I analyzed a video review of a Vegan restaurant. I’ve been analyzing reviews both written and recorded to write my own review.
The reviewers went to a Vegan Restaurant and recorded their experience. I didn’t think their review was useful because of four main reasons:
1) The quality of the video was very low, so the viewer could not have a clear image of how the food looked like in reality. The point of making a video review is to show how good or bad the food is, or to show the atmosphere of the place but if the quality is not satisfactory then the whole purpose of creating a video vanishes.
2) Instead of giving their opinions while showing how the place looked, the video consisted in them talking to the camera. Honestly I was more interested in watching with my own eyes the atmosphere of the restaurant instead of watching their faces throuought the whole review.
3) I think their review was biased by the fact that they were both vegan for at least 20 years. I couldn’t be sure if the pancakes they ate were tasty both for vegans and for ordinary people. Maybe they were used to vegan pancakes and compared to those they might have been good, but it is not necessarily so, compared to normal pancakes where eggs and butter are used.
4) They posted this review after going there just one time, which is for me, not enough to have a strong opinion on something. They should’ve gone there multiple times and made a review after considering th various experiences.
Comments
Post a Comment